? The New Zealand Food Bill and Global Administrative Law: A Recipe for Democratic Engagement
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام ساير پديدآوران
;supervisor: Knop, Karen
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
University of Toronto: Canada
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
: 2012
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
66 Pages
یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها
جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
LL.M.
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
The New Zealand Food Bill is being passed amidst stern criticism of its content and the influence on it by multi-national corporations and the Codex Alimentarius Commission, whose food-safety standards motivated the bill. These concerns illustrate the large democratic and legitimisation deficits in global governance. One response to these criticisms and concerns is global administrative law, which focuses on promoting administrative law tools to enhance accountability. However, an examination of the Food Bill reinforces two main critiques of global administrative law: that it excludes addressing substance of international law and brackets democracy. I argue the limited GAL approach cannot be justified and the significant gaps in its approach require that it engage with democracy. I analyse the possibilities of global administrative law to engage with (to acknowledge and adopt) three theories of global democracy - deliberative, cosmopolitan, and radical pluralism. I argue deliberative democracy offers the most accessible option.
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Law
موضوع مستند نشده
International law
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
International law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Global administrative law
اصطلاح موضوعی
International law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Democracy
اصطلاح موضوعی
Global governance
اصطلاح موضوعی
Global democracy
اصطلاح موضوعی
Administrative law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Globalization
اصطلاح موضوعی
New Zealand
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )