AFT, NEA, and the Politics of Performance, 1945-2015
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Nelson, Adam Rolf
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2020
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
555
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Body granting the degree
The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Text preceding or following the note
2020
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This dissertation examines the ways in which the American Federation of Teachers and National Education Association changed their national policy positions over time regarding performance-based compensation systems for teachers as alternatives to the single-salary schedule. Looking closely at the period from 1945 to 2015, this dissertation gives special attention to how both organizations responded to advocates of "merit pay," including conservative anti-tax groups who wished to curb rising educational costs, the American corporate community and its desire to advance performance-based initiatives in the name of improved educational productivity and human-capital development, and, in the last decades of the twentieth century, social justice advocates who supported performance-incentives in hopes of improving school outcomes for poor minority students. This dissertation argues that the interaction between teachers unions and performance-incentive plans reveals much about the changing role of teachers as workers in post-war American state building.