The Refutation of the Grammarians by Ibn Mada' al-Qurtubi:
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Philip Alan Johnson
Title Proper by Another Author
A translation, with syntactic analysis of "Bab al-Ishtighal"
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
A. S. Gamal
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
The University of Arizona
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
1998
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
184-184 p.
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Body granting the degree
The University of Arizona
Text preceding or following the note
1998
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Government and Binding Theory dictates that the case features of noun phrases are assigned structurally under government. On this basis the claim by Ibn Mada'al-Qurtubi, in The Refutation of the Grammarians, that case is assigned solely by the language user on strictly semantic grounds, is rejected; also untenable, however, is the position of traditional Arab grammarians that case can, in some contexts, be assigned by "concealed" governors, as the Projection and Structure-Preserving Principles require that material having semantic content be visible at all levels of representation. Government and Binding principles are adequate to account for case-assignment in the issues raised by Ibn Mada'; they cannot, however, offer a clear solution to the apparent violation of Principle C of the Binding Theory found in some examples of bab al-tanazu', the category of "contention in government".