The Perspectives and Practices of Math Teachers in General Education
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Flanagan, Tara
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
McGill University (Canada)
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2020
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
261
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Body granting the degree
McGill University (Canada)
Text preceding or following the note
2020
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Despite having disability rights and the benefit of legislation, students with disabilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) receive insufficient special education and inclusive support. A Guide for Ensuring Inclusion and Equity in Education (UNESCO, 2017) regards learner variability and identification of the barriers to learning as foundational concepts to making progress in inclusive practices that align with the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approach initiated by Rose and Meyer (2002). This qualitative study explores the perspectives of general education teachers (Ged) from leading expatriate schools in the Kingdom on these core concepts and how they address these issues in their daily practice. This multiple case study examines teachers' engagement in inclusive teaching practices by exploring the underlying mechanisms being employed in the classroom (i.e., the anticipation of variability and barriers and intentional alignment of teaching components/curricula with core components of inclusive education). Face-to-face teachers' interviews (one to three hours long), direct classroom observations (five to seven days during math instructions), participant observations, physical artifacts (educational materials) and documents (i.e., lesson plans, assessment sheets, students reflections on their learning, teaching strategies, and rubrics) were used as methods of data collection. Data were gathered from four elementary-middle school math teachers (one male, three female) from two different school districts: Saudi Aramco Expatriate School (SAES) and International School Groups-Dammam (ISG). Ged teachers in SAES showed in-depth theoretical knowledge and positive, adaptive, and malleable beliefs about variability and barriers, they used flexible instructional approaches, and were more likely to establish a non-traditional model of teaching. In contrast, those in ISG showed a more surface-level understanding of these concepts. The study suggests that teachers in Ged settings do not observe anticipation and intentional alignment across teaching components. Their curricular planning reflects a tendency to focus on the average students rather than on learner variability and potential barriers. This is the first study to develop evaluation criteria for anticipation and intentional alignment for UDL research. It also provides a universally designed blueprint for educators to practice anticipation and intentional alignment across lesson planning, learning environment, teaching methods, materials, and assessment using the core components of inclusive practices and UDL principles. Finally, the study suggests that participants in private international schools of KSA have a strong basis for initiating inclusive education models as several elements in their current teaching practices are in line with core inclusive practices in research. Recommendations are suggested to private international schools and education policymakers to facilitate inclusive education in the Kingdom.