German Defense and Security Policy-an Ontological Perspective
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Ellison, Davis Hunter
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Moroff, Holger
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2019
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
51
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
M.A.
Body granting the degree
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Text preceding or following the note
2019
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This thesis explains changing rhetorical justifications for German defense and security policy via an ontological security lens. It explores the roles that contested identity narratives play in shaping the public aspects of German policy by examining the cases of ongoing defense budget debates and the interventions/troop deployments in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and the NATO presence in the Baltic states. Through these cases, it is demonstrated that policy is often justified not through appeals to the national interest or commitment to liberal values, but rather through appeals to historical memory and a German responsibility to a variety of interchangeable sub-narratives. As crises arise, various German governments activate and deactivate certain sub-narratives in order to present their response to the crisis in a way that is consistent with the German sense of self, thus demonstrating attempts to maintain ontological security. It also shown that these sub-narratives often come into conflict.