Enacting 'creativity' in a neoliberal policy context :
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Cottle, Michelle
Title Proper by Another Author
a case study of English primary school teachers' experiences
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Crozier, Gill ; Mahony, Pat
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
University of Roehampton
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2019
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Body granting the degree
University of Roehampton
Text preceding or following the note
2019
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Creativity is very important. It is at the heart of transformative thinking processes, explaining why we have achieved so much as a species. The role of education in developing creativity has been debated for centuries, although this has been complicated by the varying definitions and applications in both academic literature and policy. The increasing dominance of neoliberal ideology across multiple social structures has caused further complications. Twin neoliberal policy emphases on managerialism and marketisation require schools to conform on the one hand and innovate on the other without clarifying how they can accommodate these contradictory demands in practice. Enactments of creativity in schools are therefore complex. This is an in-depth ethnographic case study of such enactments in a school in South East England, focusing on the experiences of the headteacher and three of the teachers over the 2012-13 academic year. Methods include observations, interviews and document analysis, employing a Bourdieusian analytic framework to conceptualise how values and practices are shaped by individual and personal experiences, as well as the system of interactive social, political and institutional 'fields' in which staff are situated. Creativity was presented as a priority in this school's local policy but, in practice, staff had little time to develop shared understandings due to contextually-determined constraints and much depended on their individual interpretations. Enactments were shaped by several interlinked factors; firstly, personal beliefs about creativity and its value; secondly, the ways that creativity related to their pedagogical values; and, thirdly, the extent to which staff had assimilated neoliberal policy dispositions into their practice. This research demonstrates that education professionals need a supportive environment in which to develop and enact creative practice and the current political climate is far from it. Over the year, this school's attempts to comply with shifting neoliberal policy frameworks overshadowed their efforts to engage in creative teaching and creative learning.