Internal politics and civic society in Augsburg during the era of the early reformation, 1518-37
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Broadhead, P.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
University of Kent at Canterbury
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
1981
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Body granting the degree
University of Kent at Canterbury
Text preceding or following the note
1981
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
In the early sixteenth century civic society in Augsburg was divided between an oligarchy of merchants, which dominated economic and political life, and the majority of townspeople who had lost their political rights and were experiencing declining standards of living. Support for the Reformation was soon voiced by the lower orders, but events demonstrated the mixed motives of the populace for pressing for religious reform. They saw in the Reformation a means of redressing their grievances and restricting the political power of the oligarchy. In the riots of 1524 and during the subsequent unrest the popular demands included religious and social reform. The oligarchs resisted change as they wished to protect their political dominance in Augsburg and their trading interests in Rabsburg lands. It was largely in response to this conflict that popular religious allegiance was given to the Zwinglians after 1525. The Zwinglian pastors demanded the establishment of a theocratic form of government which was responsive to the needs of the townspeople. This measure would force the Council to concede political influence to the pastors and to accept popular demands when formulating policy. It would not consent to this. As a result of unrest amongst the lower orders in 1533 the Council was forced to give the Zwinglian pastors a monopoly of preaching in the city but this concession was not an official Protestant Reformation. The Council, in return for its support of the pastors, forced them to accept a contract in which they acknowledged the sole authority of the Council over the political and religious life of the city. The Protestant Church therefore no longer constituted a political threat to the oligarchy, but rather encouraged obedience to the Council . It was against this new background that the Council enforced a Protestant religious settlement in 1537.