عنوان

'We Too Have a Word to Say'

Number

LA127245

.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc

انگلیسی

Title Proper

'We Too Have a Word to Say'

General Material Designation

[Article]

First Statement of Responsibility

Muzaffer Kaya

Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.

Leiden

Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.

Brill

Text of Note

This article seeks to explain how in the beginning of the 1960s in Turkey the right to strike was adopted as a social right. The existing literature is divided regarding the factors that led to the shift in governmental policy. While some argue that the state granted this right without any struggle on the side of the workers, others propose that the main determinant in the process was the struggle of workers. By scrutinizing the interaction between political developments at the state and party levels, and the actions of the workers in that period, I argue that the recognition of the right to strike was the combined result of several interrelated political developments at the local and global level. This article seeks to explain how in the beginning of the 1960s in Turkey the right to strike was adopted as a social right. The existing literature is divided regarding the factors that led to the shift in governmental policy. While some argue that the state granted this right without any struggle on the side of the workers, others propose that the main determinant in the process was the struggle of workers. By scrutinizing the interaction between political developments at the state and party levels, and the actions of the workers in that period, I argue that the recognition of the right to strike was the combined result of several interrelated political developments at the local and global level. This article seeks to explain how in the beginning of the 1960s in Turkey the right to strike was adopted as a social right. The existing literature is divided regarding the factors that led to the shift in governmental policy. While some argue that the state granted this right without any struggle on the side of the workers, others propose that the main determinant in the process was the struggle of workers. By scrutinizing the interaction between political developments at the state and party levels, and the actions of the workers in that period, I argue that the recognition of the right to strike was the combined result of several interrelated political developments at the local and global level. This article seeks to explain how in the beginning of the 1960s in Turkey the right to strike was adopted as a social right. The existing literature is divided regarding the factors that led to the shift in governmental policy. While some argue that the state granted this right without any struggle on the side of the workers, others propose that the main determinant in the process was the struggle of workers. By scrutinizing the interaction between political developments at the state and party levels, and the actions of the workers in that period, I argue that the recognition of the right to strike was the combined result of several interrelated political developments at the local and global level.

Date of Publication

2018

Physical description

48-68

Title

The Journal of Interrupted Studies

Volume Number

1/1

International Standard Serial Number

2543-0149

Subject Term

African Studies

Subject Term

Classical Studies

Subject Term

Cultural Heritage Protection

Subject Term

EU Law

Subject Term

General

Subject Term

Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Subject Term

International Law: General Interest

Subject Term

Labor historiography

Subject Term

labor law

Subject Term

labor movement

Subject Term

Turkish history

Muzaffer Kaya

Call Number

10.1163/25430149-00101002

Electronic name

p

[Article]

275578

a

Y