عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY NUMBER
Number
LA125943
LANGUAGE OF THE ITEM
.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc
انگلیسی
TITLE AND STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
Title Proper
Reconciling Pluralistic Democracy and Religious Freedom in European Human Rights Law:
General Material Designation
[Article]
Other Title Information
A Jurisprudential Balance in Search of Principles
First Statement of Responsibility
Roberto Buonamano
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This article examines some of the structural and systemic issues associated with the relationship between pluralistic democracy and religious freedom within the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. These include the problematic aspects of the doctrine of State neutrality, and the function of secularism in the understanding of "democratic society". It assesses the principal jurisprudential mechanisms utilised in religious freedom cases-namely, the notion of "public order", the association of secularism with gender equality, the principles of the "minimum requirements of life in society", and the margin of appreciation in the context of democratic legitimation. As the article demonstrates, the Court's approach to negotiating the appropriate balance between pluralistic democracy and religious rights is marred by a reluctance to clearly elucidate the principles involved in the implementation of democratic values under the Convention when considering the means of protecting and limiting the freedom of religion. This article examines some of the structural and systemic issues associated with the relationship between pluralistic democracy and religious freedom within the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. These include the problematic aspects of the doctrine of State neutrality, and the function of secularism in the understanding of "democratic society". It assesses the principal jurisprudential mechanisms utilised in religious freedom cases-namely, the notion of "public order", the association of secularism with gender equality, the principles of the "minimum requirements of life in society", and the margin of appreciation in the context of democratic legitimation. As the article demonstrates, the Court's approach to negotiating the appropriate balance between pluralistic democracy and religious rights is marred by a reluctance to clearly elucidate the principles involved in the implementation of democratic values under the Convention when considering the means of protecting and limiting the freedom of religion.
SET
Date of Publication
2019
Physical description
169-203
Title
Religion & Human Rights
Volume Number
14/3
International Standard Serial Number
1871-0328
UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS
Subject Term
European Court of Human Rights
Subject Term
gender equality
Subject Term
General
Subject Term
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
Subject Term
living together
Subject Term
pluralistic democracy
Subject Term
public order
Subject Term
Religion & Society
Subject Term
religious freedom
Subject Term
Religious Studies
Subject Term
secularism
Subject Term
Social Sciences
Subject Term
State neutrality
PERSONAL NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY
Roberto Buonamano
LOCATION AND CALL NUMBER
Call Number
10.1163/18710328-13021149
ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Electronic name
مطالعه متن کتاب p
[Article]
275578
a
Y
