عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY NUMBER
Number
LA125922
LANGUAGE OF THE ITEM
.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc
انگلیسی
TITLE AND STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
Title Proper
Limitations on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Quarter Century since Its Judgment in Kokkinakis v. Greece
General Material Designation
[Article]
First Statement of Responsibility
Mark Hill, Katherine Barnes
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
The manifestation of religious beliefs under Article 9 the European Convention on Human Rights is not absolute but may be subject to prescribed limitations. This article discusses the nature and extent of those limitations, as interpreted in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights from its decision in Kokkinakis v. Greece up to the present. It contrasts the prescriptive text of the Article with its lose and inconsistent interpretation by the Court in Strasbourg. Particular attention is given to the criteria of "prescribed by law", "necessary in a democratic society", "public safety", "public order, health or morals" and "the rights and freedoms of others". It seeks to divine principles from the varied jurisprudence, particularly at its intersection with the Court's illusory doctrine of margin of appreciation. The manifestation of religious beliefs under Article 9 the European Convention on Human Rights is not absolute but may be subject to prescribed limitations. This article discusses the nature and extent of those limitations, as interpreted in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights from its decision in Kokkinakis v. Greece up to the present. It contrasts the prescriptive text of the Article with its lose and inconsistent interpretation by the Court in Strasbourg. Particular attention is given to the criteria of "prescribed by law", "necessary in a democratic society", "public safety", "public order, health or morals" and "the rights and freedoms of others". It seeks to divine principles from the varied jurisprudence, particularly at its intersection with the Court's illusory doctrine of margin of appreciation.
SET
Date of Publication
2017
Physical description
174-197
Title
Religion & Human Rights
Volume Number
12/2-3
International Standard Serial Number
1871-0328
UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS
Subject Term
Article 9
Subject Term
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
Subject Term
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Subject Term
freedom of religion
Subject Term
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
Subject Term
Kokkinakis
Subject Term
limitations
Subject Term
margin of appreciation
Subject Term
public order
Subject Term
Religion & Society
Subject Term
rights and freedoms of others
Subject Term
Social Sciences
PERSONAL NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY
Katherine Barnes
Mark Hill
LOCATION AND CALL NUMBER
Call Number
10.1163/18710328-12231158
ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Electronic name
مطالعه متن کتاب p
[Article]
275578
a
Y
