Was Arminius an (Unwitting) Determinist? Another Look at Arminius's Modal Logic
General Material Designation
[Article]
First Statement of Responsibility
Thomas H. McCall
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Eef Dekker argues, on the basis of a letter from Jacob Arminius to Johannes Uytenbogaert in 1598, that Arminius's modal logic commits him to determinism. In this essay, I revisit Arminius's modal logic. I grant that Dekker may be correct in his analysis of this letter and its contents, but I argue that Arminius's musings in this letter are not representative of his mature thought. I argue that Arminius significantly alters his views, and that with a bit of further correction Arminius's position can avoid determinism. Eef Dekker argues, on the basis of a letter from Jacob Arminius to Johannes Uytenbogaert in 1598, that Arminius's modal logic commits him to determinism. In this essay, I revisit Arminius's modal logic. I grant that Dekker may be correct in his analysis of this letter and its contents, but I argue that Arminius's musings in this letter are not representative of his mature thought. I argue that Arminius significantly alters his views, and that with a bit of further correction Arminius's position can avoid determinism.