What If? An Experiment to Include a Religious Narrative in the Approach of the European Court of Human Rights
General Material Designation
[Article]
First Statement of Responsibility
Anicée Van Engeland
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill | Nijhoff
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
According to some interpretations of Islam supported by gender activists, the veil can be perceived as a passport that enables women to participate in public affairs. This argument has been overlooked by the courts, including the European Court of Human Rights. The latter has adopted a discourse that considers the veil to be a threat to public order and gender equality, and more recently, an obstacle to social cohesion. By doing so, the Court has excluded veiled European Muslim women from the public sphere. The Court has justified curbing freedom of religion by granting states a wide margin of appreciation on the basis of the concept of "living together." I argue that the Court needs to take the "passport veil" into account to be consistent with its argument on living together. A shift of approach and discourse would constitute a new way of understanding integration through the veil.