Elitist, Populist or Prophetic?A Critique of Public Theologizing in Democratic South Africa
General Material Designation
[Article]
First Statement of Responsibility
Jakub Urbaniak
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Much has been already written about public theology's prophetic role in democratic South Africa. This study seeks to offer a reality check. By probing some of Nico Koopman's views on justice and reconciliation I draw tentative conclusions regarding the shortcomings characteristic of the prevalent discourses that have developed in South Africa under the umbrella of public theology since the mid-1990s. I seek to explain why liberation theologies-be it black, feminist or queer-may and should constructively disrupt these discourses. I also point to some promising (prophetically-loaded) insights coming from the chosen public theologians that revolve around the tension between civic spirit and public anger. Lastly, I suggest that one essential aspect of public theologians' navigating between a populist temptation and a prophetic calling may be found in the need to rethink their theological accountability whereby grooving with people's anger appears as a sine qua non condition for prophetic theologizing. Much has been already written about public theology's prophetic role in democratic South Africa. This study seeks to offer a reality check. By probing some of Nico Koopman's views on justice and reconciliation I draw tentative conclusions regarding the shortcomings characteristic of the prevalent discourses that have developed in South Africa under the umbrella of public theology since the mid-1990s. I seek to explain why liberation theologies-be it black, feminist or queer-may and should constructively disrupt these discourses. I also point to some promising (prophetically-loaded) insights coming from the chosen public theologians that revolve around the tension between civic spirit and public anger. Lastly, I suggest that one essential aspect of public theologians' navigating between a populist temptation and a prophetic calling may be found in the need to rethink their theological accountability whereby grooving with people's anger appears as a sine qua non condition for prophetic theologizing.