Some Thoughts on Where We Go From Here - A Hermeneutical Proposal
First Statement of Responsibility
Paul Hedges
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This paper overviews contemporary debates on the deconstruction / historization of the category 'religion'. It argues that a hard deconstruction which seeks to suggest the term is an empty signifier and analytically useless is unfounded philosophically and empirically. However, a soft deconstruction which accepts the problems of employing the term, especially as found in the World Religions Paradigm, but suggests that 'religion' remains a useful tool to describe a specific social reality, is well founded. The article extends current debates by showing how philosophical hermeneutics, especially as exemplified by Hans-Georg Gadamer's work, supports the soft deconstructive approach and further shows the conceptual inadequacy of hard deconstruction. This paper overviews contemporary debates on the deconstruction / historization of the category 'religion'. It argues that a hard deconstruction which seeks to suggest the term is an empty signifier and analytically useless is unfounded philosophically and empirically. However, a soft deconstruction which accepts the problems of employing the term, especially as found in the World Religions Paradigm, but suggests that 'religion' remains a useful tool to describe a specific social reality, is well founded. The article extends current debates by showing how philosophical hermeneutics, especially as exemplified by Hans-Georg Gadamer's work, supports the soft deconstructive approach and further shows the conceptual inadequacy of hard deconstruction.