عنوان

Land Grab, Property Rights and Gender Equality in Pluralistic Legal Orders:

Number

LA108179

.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc

انگلیسی

Title Proper

Land Grab, Property Rights and Gender Equality in Pluralistic Legal Orders:

General Material Designation

[Article]

Other Title Information

A Nigerian Perspective

First Statement of Responsibility

Chilenye Nwapi

Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.

Leiden

Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.

Brill | Nijhoff

Text of Note

This article considers the impact of land grab on the promotion of gender inequality within the Nigerian pluralistic legal order. It examines the interface between customary law and statute law in the determination of land ownership and access in Nigeria. It makes two key arguments. (1) While legal pluralism presents opportunities for curtailing the excesses of customary law, it has often resulted in the dominant legal system - statute law - fostering gender inequality in a manner that is beyond the capacity of the so-called barbaric customary laws. (2) The capacity of law to effectively address the problem of gender inequality within the context of land grab is very limited, because the nature of most land grab-related activities that promote gender inequality are appropriately legal and it is their unintended consequences that undermine women's rights. The article argues for an effective use of the political process to complement legal interventions. This article considers the impact of land grab on the promotion of gender inequality within the Nigerian pluralistic legal order. It examines the interface between customary law and statute law in the determination of land ownership and access in Nigeria. It makes two key arguments. (1) While legal pluralism presents opportunities for curtailing the excesses of customary law, it has often resulted in the dominant legal system - statute law - fostering gender inequality in a manner that is beyond the capacity of the so-called barbaric customary laws. (2) The capacity of law to effectively address the problem of gender inequality within the context of land grab is very limited, because the nature of most land grab-related activities that promote gender inequality are appropriately legal and it is their unintended consequences that undermine women's rights. The article argues for an effective use of the political process to complement legal interventions. This article considers the impact of land grab on the promotion of gender inequality within the Nigerian pluralistic legal order. It examines the interface between customary law and statute law in the determination of land ownership and access in Nigeria. It makes two key arguments. (1) While legal pluralism presents opportunities for curtailing the excesses of customary law, it has often resulted in the dominant legal system - statute law - fostering gender inequality in a manner that is beyond the capacity of the so-called barbaric customary laws. (2) The capacity of law to effectively address the problem of gender inequality within the context of land grab is very limited, because the nature of most land grab-related activities that promote gender inequality are appropriately legal and it is their unintended consequences that undermine women's rights. The article argues for an effective use of the political process to complement legal interventions. This article considers the impact of land grab on the promotion of gender inequality within the Nigerian pluralistic legal order. It examines the interface between customary law and statute law in the determination of land ownership and access in Nigeria. It makes two key arguments. (1) While legal pluralism presents opportunities for curtailing the excesses of customary law, it has often resulted in the dominant legal system - statute law - fostering gender inequality in a manner that is beyond the capacity of the so-called barbaric customary laws. (2) The capacity of law to effectively address the problem of gender inequality within the context of land grab is very limited, because the nature of most land grab-related activities that promote gender inequality are appropriately legal and it is their unintended consequences that undermine women's rights. The article argues for an effective use of the political process to complement legal interventions.

Date of Publication

2016

Physical description

124-146

Title

African Journal of Legal Studies

Volume Number

9/2

International Standard Serial Number

1708-7384

Subject Term

customary law

Subject Term

gender inequality

Subject Term

land grab

Subject Term

legal pluralism

Subject Term

property rights

Subject Term

statute law

Chilenye Nwapi

Call Number

10.1163/17087384-12340005

Electronic name

p

[Article]

275578

a

Y