Predicting Expected Budgets: Integrated Quality and Risk
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Duran, Jason Pablo
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Fossaceca, John
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
The George Washington University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2019
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
114 p.
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
D.Engr.
Body granting the degree
The George Washington University
Text preceding or following the note
2019
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
If you were to ask any software development manager if quality is an essential attribute for delivering a project on time and within budget, they would emphatically answer "yes". If you were to ask these same managers if they incorporated existing quality metrics into their baselining and budgeting processes, few managers would answer in the affirmative. Although mid to large-sized software projects overrun planned budgets at an alarming frequency, most projects fail to include quality data in the estimation process. This study examines some of the most extensively adopted estimation techniques and identifies how these techniques fail to utilize quality measures. In addition, a new model is introduced that incorporates quality metrics, which reduce variance between estimates and project actual expenditures. This research illustrates how the incorporation of quality data into estimation and baseline processes can potentially reduce software project failure rates.