عنوان

The completeness of Kant's table of judgments /

(Number (ISBN

0804719349

(Number (ISBN

9780804719346

Number

b800135

Title Proper

The completeness of Kant's table of judgments /

General Material Designation

[Book]

First Statement of Responsibility

Klaus Reich ; translated by Jane Kneller and Michael Losonsky.

Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.

Stanford, Calif. :

Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.

Stanford University Press,

Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.

©1992.

Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item

xxii, 132 pages ;

Dimensions

22 cm

Series Title

Stanford series in philosophy. Studies in Kant and German idealism

Text of Note

Translation of: Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel.

Text of Note

Includes bibliographical references (pages 113-132).

Text of Note

The problem and the clue -- The highest point : the objective unity of self-consciousness -- The analytic unity of consciousness -- The definition of judgment -- Outline of the systematization of the primary functions -- Textual justification -- Completeness.

0

Text of Note

This classic of Kant scholarship, whose first edition appeared in 1932, deals with one of the most controversial and difficult topics in the Critique of Pure Reason: Kant's table of judgments and their connection to the table of categories. Kant's attempt to derive the latter from the former is called the "Metaphysical Deduction," and it paves the way for the Transcendental Deduction that is universally recognized as the heart of the Critique. Many commentators have passed over the Metaphysical Deduction in silence, as if embarrassed by Kant's fatuity, and his critics are almost unanimous in finding its premise ungrounded, its argument incorrect, and its conclusion false. At the heart of the failure of the Metaphysical Deduction, it is alleged, is Kant's inability to justify the table of the forms of judgment. Critics argue that Kant simply took these forms of judgment from the logic textbooks of his day and doctored them so as to yield the required categories. Such objections were current even in Kant's time; they were repeated by Hegel, and are commonplaces of Kant criticism today. This book is the fullest and most systematic evaluation ever made of the Metaphysical Deduction. Reich argues that its principal conclusion is correct even though Kant failed to establish it in the Metaphysical Deduction proper, and he defends the conclusion by using Kant material far removed from the text of the Metaphysical Deduction, notes by Kant that only became available in the 1920's and that remain even now untranslated into English. With the publication of this translation for English-speaking Kant scholars, a neglected and impugned part of the Critique of Pure Reason can finally receive the attention it deserves.

General Material Designation

Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel.

Language (when part of a heading)

English

Kant, Immanuel,1724-1804., Kritik der reinen Vernunft.

Kant, Immanuel,1724-1804

Kant, Immanuel,1724-1804., Kritik der reinen Vernunft

Kant, Immanuel,1724-1804-- Et la logique transcendantale

Kant, Immanuel,1724-1804, Kritik der reinen Vernunft.

Kant, Immanuel.

Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Kant, Immanuel)

Categories (Philosophy)-- History-- 18th century.

Judgment (Logic)

Catégories (Philosophie)-- Histoire-- 18e siècle

Jugement (Logique)

Logique transcendantale

Categories (Philosophy)

FILOSOFIA MODERNA-- ALEMANHA.

Judgment (Logic)

Logica.

Oordeel.

Urteil

Number

Edition

Class number

Book number

Class number

Class number

System Code

System Code

Reich, Klaus,1906-

Date of Transaction

20201207123001.0

Electronic name

[Book]

Y