The historiography of landscape research on Crete /
General Material Designation
[Book]
First Statement of Responsibility
Marina Gkiasta.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
[Amsterdam] :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Leiden University Press,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
[2008]
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
1 online resource (279 pages) :
Other Physical Details
illustrations, digital, PDF file.
SERIES
Series Title
Archaeological studies Leiden University,
Volume Designation
16
ISSN of Series
1388-414X ;
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Introduction; 1. The History of Landscape Archaeology: Major Traditions andApproaches; 2. Methodology of Studying Landscape Research in Crete; 3. Landscape Research Projects in Crete: Text Analysis; 4. Analytical Approaches towards the Study of intra-TraditionVariability and inter-Tradition Comparisons.; 5. Historiography of Landscape Research in Crete; 6. Using Landscape Research Data in Siteia, eastern Crete: a CaseStudy.; 7. CONCLUSIONS: Archaeological Survey Data Integration; References; Survey bibliography; List of Figures; List of Tables; List of Graphs; List of appendices
Text of Note
Abbreviations and VocabularyAcknowledgements; Curriculum Vitae
0
8
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This study aimed to construct a historiography of archaeological landscape research on the island of Crete and evaluate the knowledge acquired through different approaches of over more than a century's intense archaeological work. It provides a detailed analysis of relevant projects, which are seen within a wider historical framework of archaeological landscape research from the beginnings of the discipline (19th century) to the present day. The five (5) major 'traditions' or else 'approaches' of studying past landscapes that are identified, demonstrate certain common attributes in questions asked, methodology followed and interpretative suggestions. Analysis, however, has shown that these 'traditions' have been in a continuous interplay and have each their own limitations as well as worthy contribution to the study of the Cretan past. The assessment of archaeological landscape work on Crete and the use of landscape data in a case study area for the historical reconstruction of human activity, concluded on the need to be explicit regarding 1) the relationship between data and interpretations and 2) the kind of information we need to produce and publish from landscape research so that we promote archaeological knowledge and allow a higher level of communication within the archaeological community.