Tradition and innovation in modern English dictionaries /
General Material Designation
[Book]
First Statement of Responsibility
Henri Béjoint.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
New York :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Oxford University Press,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
1994.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
xii, 276 pages ;
Dimensions
23 cm
SERIES
Series Title
Oxford studies in lexicography and lexicology
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Dictionaries and the dictionary -- The lexicographical scene of English-speaking countries -- The historical origins of the general-purpose dictionary -- General-purpose dictionaries and society -- What are general-purpose dictionaries really for? -- The linguistic traditions of lexicography -- Whither lexicography?
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
There has been an extraordinary increase in the production of monolingual dictionaries of English in the last three decades. Despite some interesting recent developments in dictionary design and layout, in many fundamental respects the dictionaries of today are very similar to those produced several centuries ago. Dr. Bejoint argues that this conservatism reflects the importance of the dictionary as culturally-constructed artefact. Dictionaries have remained the same because their traditional form exerts a powerful influence on popular ideas of what they should be. Contemporary research and theory will only filter though into dictionary-making when popular ideas about language and dictionaries change. This must be a slow process because the dictionaries are themselves such a powerful influence in the shaping of these ideas.
OTHER EDITION IN ANOTHER MEDIUM
Title
Tradition and innovation in modern English dictionaries.
Title
Tradition and innovation in modern English dictionaries.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Encyclopedias and dictionaries-- History and criticism.