Preface -- Part I: Philosophical logic and philosophy of language -- Rules versus theorems : a new approach for mediation between intuitionistic and two-valued logic (1973) -- On the relation between the partition of a whole into parts and the attribution of properties to an object (1977) -- Basic objectives of dialogic logic in historical perspective (2001) -- Pragmatic and semiotic prerequisites for predication : a dialogue model (2005) -- Pragmatics and semiotics : the peircean version of ontology and epistemology (1994)-- Intentionality and its language-dependency (1985) -- Meaning postulates and rules of argumentation : remarks concerning the pragmatic tie between meaning (of terms) and truth (of propositions) (1987) -- What do language games measure? (1989) -- Features of Indian logic (2008) -- Part II: Methods in philosophy, in art, and in science -- The concept of science : some remarks on the methodological issue construction versus description in the philosophy of science (1979) -- Is and ought revisited (1987) -- Competition and cooperation : are they antagonistic or complementary? (1994) -- Another version of methodological dualism (1997) -- The pre-established harmony between the two Adams (1993) -- On the way to conceptual and perceptual knowledge (1993) -- Self and other : remarks on human nature and human culture (2002) -- On the concept of symmetry (2005) -- Procedural principles of the Eerlangen School : on the interrelation between the principles of method, of dialogue, and of reason (2008).
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Papers from more than three decades reflect the development of thinking over the dialogical framework that shapes verbal expression of comprehending experience and that has to be exhibited in responsible argumentations. With dialogical reconstructions of experience owing to the methodical constructivism of the "Erlangen School" it is possible to uncover the origin of many conceptual oppositions in traditional philosophical talk, like natural vs. artificial/cultural, subjective vs. objective, etc., and to solve philosophical riddles connected with them.