عنوان

Fabricating History:

Number

TL9d63w9m0

.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc

انگلیسی

Title Proper

Fabricating History:

General Material Designation

[Thesis]

First Statement of Responsibility

Rivas, Carlos Anilber

Title Proper by Another Author

The Codex Mendoza and Manuscript Production during the Founding of New Spain

Subsequent Statement of Responsibility

Villase�or Black, Charlene

Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.

UCLA

Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.

2013

Body granting the degree

UCLA

Text preceding or following the note

2013

Text of Note

This thesis examines the historiography of the Codex Mendoza, one of the earliest surviving and most important manuscripts produced in Mexico after the conquest. In particular, I examine its provenance and evaluate its known documented history. How did this manuscript, produced in 1540 in Mexico by native artists and scribes, reach Europe and when? This reexamination highlights the absence of documentation supporting the widely-held belief that the Codex Mendoza reached France and not Spain, its intended destination, after the ship carrying it to Europe was plundered by pirates.�After closely examining what is known of the manuscript's provenance and suggesting a complete rethinking of what we know about the Codex Mendoza, this thesis demonstrates the interpretive side-effects of current assumptions about the manuscript's provenance and dependance on out of date historiography. The Codex Mendoza's assumed patronage and believed-intended audience has conditioned art historians to interpret the artistic style of the manuscript as containing European influence. However, a close re-examination of the codex in relation to other manuscripts produced in New Spain at the same time demonstrates that the Codex Mendoza's content and visual style is effectively all from the pre-conquest period and therefore radically different from most manuscripts produced at the time. Significantly, almost no comparisons exist in the literature on the topic making this comparison one of the first such contextual stylistic analyses of the Codex Mendoza. In addition, the methodologies employed by art historians in their study of the style of sixteenth-century manuscripts from New Spain have proved problematic, and in the case of the Codex Mendoza specifically, its believed European patronage has preconditioned�interpretations�of its artistic style. To address this problem I compare the Codex Mendoza with a contemporaneous manuscript of similar provenance. The comparison reveals that the existence and circulation of multiple visual styles and narrative strategies in manuscripts during the 1540s in New Spain was directly related to the intended purpose of the manuscript itself. This comparison also allows for the�Codex Mendoza's�proper placement within its art historical context and the broader context of manuscript production in New Spain.

Rivas, Carlos Anilber

Villase�or Black, Charlene

UCLA

Electronic name

p

[Thesis]

276903

a

Y