Communitarian water providers in peri-urban areas :
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Minelli, Francesca
Title Proper by Another Author
the case of Cochabamba water cooperatives
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
University of Glasgow
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2018
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Thesis (Ph.D.)
Text preceding or following the note
2018
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
In the cities of the South, water services in neighbourhoods of the poor are often obtained through self-managed organizations. This thesis aims to analyse the way in which these communitarian organizations influence the pattern of urban water governance. I define water governance as comprising state and non-state actors, institutions, practices, visions and discourses whose interactions, clashes and collaboration determine how, where, why, and by whom water and sanitation services are distributed. My fieldwork was conducted in Cochabamba, Bolivia, between September 2013 and September 2014. I carried out 44 interviews with state officials at different levels, leaders of 21 water cooperatives, as well as in-depth case studies in two water cooperatives. This was accompanied by mapping exercises, which allowed me to better place cooperatives in the territory. Analysing the case of the water cooperatives of Cochabamba, I argue that water cooperatives partially resist the attempt of the state to exercise power over their material waterscape, while also presenting alternative visions of how water provision should be carried out, both as single entities and through networks. Those two elements are fundamental for the dialectic built between the cooperatives and the state, which present instances of both conflict and cooperation. I argue therefore that communitarian organizations are not just subjected to larger-scale processes and powerful actors but that they can exercise agency and influence patterns of water provision. To understand how cooperatives influence water governance, I firmly ground actors and institutions in a waterscape. Control over their waterscape is a key component of the cooperatives' capability to influence governance at a higher scale. I argue that the relationship between a cooperative and its members is fundamental for the capability of a cooperative to control, modify and maintain its waterscape. Such a relationship is often based on the feeling of ownership of the members over the cooperatives, a feeling that was created through the history of the cooperatives. This thesis establishes the usefulness of analysing different scales and spaces to understand water governance in an urban setting. Only by analysing the different histories, forms of control, and visions of actors at different scales is it possible to understand how and why communitarian organizations shape urban water governance.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography; GN Anthropology; HM Sociology