how forensic doctors and investigators disastrously reason like the great detective /
First Statement of Responsibility
Thomas W. Young, MD.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Boca Raton, FL :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
[2018]
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
1 online resource
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Forensic science is in crisis and at a cross-roads. Movies and television dramas depict forensic heroes with high-tech tools and dazzling intellects who{u2014}inside an hour, notwithstanding commercials{u2014}piece together past-event puzzles from crime scenes and autopsies.? Likewise, Sherlock Holmes{u2014}the iconic fictional detective, and the invention of forensic doctor Sir Arthur Conan Doyle{u2014}is held up as a paragon of forensic and scientific inspiration{u2014}does not "reason forward" as most people do, but "reasons backwards." Put more plainly, rather than learning the train of events and seeing whether the resultant clues match those events, Holmes determines what happened in the past by looking at the clues.? Impressive and infallible as this technique appears to be{u2014}it must be recognized that infallibility lies only in works of fiction. Reasoning backward does not work in real life: reality is far less tidy.?
ACQUISITION INFORMATION NOTE
Source for Acquisition/Subscription Address
Ingram Content Group
Stock Number
9781351113816
OTHER EDITION IN ANOTHER MEDIUM
International Standard Book Number
0815361947
PERSONAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Holmes, Sherlock-- History and criticism.
Holmes, Sherlock.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Detective and mystery stories, English-- History and criticism.