a comparative study with Iraqi law, Islamic Sharia and English law
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Glasgow Caledonian University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2017
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Thesis (Ph.D.)
Text preceding or following the note
2017
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This research analyses the concept of good faith and contract negotiation under the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) by comparing and studying the principle in English law, Islamic law, and Iraqi law. The desire to establish a uniform law for contracts for the international sale of goods led to the development of the CISG. However, successful implantation and application of the Convention is hindered to some extent by the divergent interpretations and applications of the good faith provisions by national courts, international private law and arbitral tribunals because of the lack of harmonised conceptualisation of good faith at an international level under the CISG. This research seeks to address the application of good faith under the CISG through a conceptual study of this principle using comparative analysis, demonstrating that good faith is commonly considered and represented across legal systems in which it is used as an implied term for interpreting contracts. The thesis explores the concept of good faith by critically analysing its relationship with contractual rules, the consequences of its application in contractual agreements, and its role and importance in national legal systems, international private law and other international legal instruments. A critical analysis of the drafting history and authentic text of Article 7 of CISG shows that it is possible to implement good faith in the CISG more widely. This work also critically reviews transnational CISG cases that refer to the concept of good faith to establish that the jurisprudence has adopted good faith as a general principle in the CISG.