Preaching Behind the Fiery Pulpit: Rhetoric, Public Memory, and Self-Immolation
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
James Chase Sanchez
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Lucas, Brad E.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Texas Christian University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2017
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
314
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
Committee members: Enos, Richard L.; Hogg, Charlotte; Krochmal, Max
NOTES PERTAINING TO PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Text of Note
Place of publication: United States, Ann Arbor; ISBN=978-1-369-79773-2
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Discipline of degree
Addran College of Humanities and Social Sciences
Body granting the degree
Texas Christian University
Text preceding or following the note
2017
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This dissertation analyzes the rhetorical events leading to a white Methodist preacher's suicide protest by fire in Grand Saline, TX on June 23rd, 2014. Charles Moore, the self-immolator, killed himself in public to protest the racist legacy of the town, causing a debate about the town's racial memories of the KKK and lynchings. Exploring Buddhism, the Arab Spring, and recent self-immolations in Tibet, this project situates Moore's death in the lineage of self-immolations globally and analyzes how this public act attempts to persuade a local audience. Chapter 2 first uncovers contemporary and historical exigencies of self-immolation, analyzing the rhetorical conditions surrounding why people choose this act, such as through the likes of solidarity, enlightenment, and last efforts. Chapter 3 parses the complex persuasive themes embedded within the act, including dynamics of violence and nonviolence, religion, and sacrifice, and appeals within the act, including transcendence and embodiment. The dissertation then localizes Moore's protest by employing an enhanced methodology of public memory. Chapter 4 not only argues for the need of a local methodology to better grasp the intricacies of the self-immolation but also presents a heuristic to understand how such a public death divided a small town in terms of their views on race and racism. Finally, Chapter 5 articulates how public memories of racism created an imaginary framed by both town insiders and outsiders and also explains how Moore embedded public memory discourse in his self-immolation by utilizing a space known for racial crimes, making explicit references to local narratives in circulation, and invoking extremism in action. Beyond furthering rhetorical studies and public memory, this project presents a methodology that combines auto-ethnography, interviews, and archival materials to contextualize the author's own memories of Grand Saline (his hometown) as they relate to public memory, race, and reconciliation. In doing so, the dissertation makes the case for the field to deploy mixed-method approaches to study acts of extremism and racism in their local and larger contexts. Ultimately, the dissertation shows how individual acts of political extremism have rhetorical power in how they shape and confront the ongoing work of public memory.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Rhetoric
UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS
Subject Term
Language, literature and linguistics;Imaginary;Public memory;Racism;Reconciliation;Rhetoric;Self-immolation