Hermeneutics of desire: ontologies of gender and desire in early Hanafī law
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Saadia Yacoob
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Moosa, Ebrahim; Prasad, Leela
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Duke University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2016
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
258
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
Committee members: Ali, Kecia; Hammer, Juliane; Morgan, David
NOTES PERTAINING TO PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Text of Note
Place of publication: United States, Ann Arbor; ISBN=978-1-369-42909-1
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Discipline of degree
Religion
Body granting the degree
Duke University
Text preceding or following the note
2016
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This dissertation examines the construction of gendered legal subjects in the influential legal works of the eleventh century Hanafi jurist, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Sarakhsi (d. 483 A.H./1090 C.E.). In particular, I explore how gendered subjects are imagined in legal matters pertaining to sexual desire. Through a close reading of several legal cases, I argue that gendered subjects in his legal work al-Mabsut are constructed through an ontological framework that conceptualizes men as active and desiring and women as passive and desirable. This binary construal of gendered nature serves as a hermeneutical given in al-Sarakhsi's legal argumentation and is produced through a phallocentric epistemology. Al-Sarakhsi's discussions of desire and sexuality are mediated through the experience of the male body. While the dissertation endeavors to show the centrality of the active/passive binary in al-Sarakhsi's legal reasoning, it also highlights the dissonances and fissures in the text's construction of gendered subjects of desire. By tracing the intricacies of al-Sarakhsi's legal reasoning, I note moments in which the text makes contradictory claims about gender and desire, as well as moments in which al-Sarakhsi must contend with realities that seemingly run up against his ontological framework. These moments in the text draw our attention to al-Sarakhsi's active attempt at maintaining the coherence of the gendered ontology. I thus argue that the gendered ontology in al-Sarakhsi's text is a legal fiction that both reflects his assumptions about gendered nature but is also constructed to rationalize legal precedence.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Religion; Law; Islamic Studies
UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS
Subject Term
Philosophy, religion and theology;Social sciences;Gender and sexuality;Hanafi law;History of sexuality;Islam and gender;Islamic law