The metonym of mystery: Representations of clandestine service in American presidential rhetoric
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
David James Berver
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
ORNATOWSKI, CEZAR
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
San Diego State University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2015
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
111
NOTES PERTAINING TO PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Text of Note
Place of publication: United States, Ann Arbor; ISBN=978-1-321-94144-9
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
M.A.
Discipline of degree
Rhetoric and Writing
Body granting the degree
San Diego State University
Text preceding or following the note
2015
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
The Edward Snowden leaks caused President Barack Obama to defend intelligence organizations, but this was not the first time a President spoke in defense of clandestine organizations. With a viewpoint based in Kenneth Burke's dramatism and classical rhetoric, this thesis evaluates what these speeches say about the relationship between the American people and their government. The focus is on a historical trajectory of how the metonym of government is constructed, starting with Dwight D. Eisenhower's "Statement by the President regarding U-2 incident" in 1960, continuing with John Fitzgerald Kennedy's "The President and the Press" in 1961, then moving on to Ronald Reagan's "Address to the Nation on Iran-Contra" in 1987, before ending with Barack Obama's "Remarks by the President on Review of Signals Intelligence" in 2014. This thesis theorizes that due to the increasing amount of information inequality experienced by citizens, Presidential speeches about state secrecy have shifted from Burkean pragmatism to Burkean idealism, and as a result has shifted from an Aristotelean conception of rhetoric to a Platonic conception of rhetoric. This thesis finds that national security, once represented as a concern for everyone, has become represented as a concern for only a small section of the American populace. Specifically, state secrecy functions to make it so that only a select subset of the American people can legitimately interact with national security.