Tawhidic Allah or the Trinity in view of inherent human relatedness
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Brian Scalise
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Smither, Edward L.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Liberty University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2014
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
219
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
Committee members: Hartman, Dayton; Morrison, John
NOTES PERTAINING TO PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Text of Note
Place of publication: United States, Ann Arbor; ISBN=978-1-321-16459-6
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Discipline of degree
Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary
Body granting the degree
Liberty University
Text preceding or following the note
2014
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This dissertation is an inquiry into the nature of the Deity in view of human relationships. Human relationships exist and are definitive of what it means to exist as a human. In this sense, human relating is an inherent aspect of the experience of humanity, i.e., they are inescapable. Does the Christian doctrine of Trinity or Islam's doctrine of Tawhidic (monadic) Allah more adequately account for the existence of human relationships and their inescapability? This question is analyzed by comparing the Tawhidic nature of Allah with the Trinitarian nature of God in order to evaluate and clarify which doctrine is the best explanation for human relationships. Thus, this is an abductive argument, inferring from the evidence to the best explanation. By first reflecting on how humanity exists in terms of oneness, distinctness, and relatedness, the doctrine of Tawhidic Allah is investigated to observe how well it grounds these aspects of human relationships. Then, the same is done concerning the Trinity's ability to ground these. The conclusion compares and contrasts the Trinity and Allah to explain which one better accounts for human relationships. Following this conclusion, there are a number of ramifications that are discussed.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Theology; Islamic Studies; Comparative
UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS
Subject Term
Philosophy, religion and theology;Social sciences;Allah;Anthropology;Apologetics;Comparative religion;Sociology;Trinity