The politics of practice: diplomacy and legitimacy in international society.
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
David Edward Banks
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Finnemore, Martha; Farrell, Henry
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
The George Washington University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2015
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
395
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
Committee members: Adcock, Robert; Goldgeier, James; Sell, Susan
NOTES PERTAINING TO PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Text of Note
Place of publication: United States, Ann Arbor; ISBN=978-1-321-51521-3
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Discipline of degree
Political Science
Body granting the degree
The George Washington University
Text preceding or following the note
2015
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Why do states reject Westphalian diplomatic practice? Diplomacy in international society is a highly regulated practice involving the exchange of representatives, the hosting of embassies, the upholding of rights of immunity and extraterritoriality, and the performance of ceremonial and protocol. Although it appears anachronistic, it is an efficient medium through which all states can participate in diplomacy. Furthermore, it is a low-cost practice to faithfully engage in, but generates considerable costs for those states that refuse to do so. Given all these factors, why would states reject it?
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
International Relations; Political science
UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS
Subject Term
Social sciences;Diplomacy;International relations;International society;Legitimacy;Narrative binding;Practice