Episteme, A Series in the Foundational, Methodological, Philosophical, Psychological, Sociological, and Political Aspects of the Sciences, Pure and Applied, 24.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
One Is it appropriate to ask 'What is truth'? --; Two Is it appropriate to ask for the meaning or for the definition of the expression 'truth', 'the true' or 'true'? --; Three Is the expression true superfluous and/or not a predicate? --; Four Can the rules of a deductive system be called true or false? --; Five Are definitions true or false? --; Six Judgements, propositions, sentences --; Seven Is a sentence true iff it corresponds to reality --; Eight Are there negative facts or properties? --; Nine Can a false theory be nearer to the truth than another false theory? --; Ten Ens et verum convertuntur? --; References --; Name index.
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
There are basic questions concerning truth that have been perennial throughout the history of philosophy from the Ancient Greeks onwards: Is `true' a superfluous particle? Is `true' a predicate? What is the relation of truth to the validity of inference rules? Are definitions true or false? What are the bearers of truth - sentences, judgements, or propositions? Can truth be interpreted by correspondence to facts, despite difficulties with the Liar and with a definition of `fact'? Can we have a consistent and adequate understanding of approximate truth (verisimilitude)? And the metaphysical question: does truth have some relation to being? All these questions are treated in a rigorous argumentation style: (1) Question, (2) objections to a positive answer, (3) answer and thesis, (4) comments and reply to the objections. This transparent, systematic style facilitates our understanding, touches on a variety of aspects of the question, and teaches us to think.