Towards the Conceptual Interaction Among Soviet Philosophy, Neo-Thomism, Pragmatism, and Phenomenology
First Statement of Responsibility
by Tom Rockmore, William J. Gavin, James G. Colbert, Thomas J. Blakeley.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Dordrecht
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Springer Netherlands
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
1981
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
(XIV, 314 pages).
SERIES
Series Title
Sovietica, Publications and Monographs of the Institute of East-European Studies at the University of Fribourg/Switzerland and The Center For East Europe, Russia and Asia at Boston College and The Seminar for Political Theory and Philosophy at the University of Munich, 45.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
One: The Immanence of Marxism-Leninism --; 1. Emergence of the "New Soviet Man" --; 2. The Scientific-Technological Revolution --; 3. Dialectical Logic --; 4. The Dialectic of Nature --; 5. Meta-Marxism --; Two: The Transcendence of Neo-Thomism --; 6. Natural Law and the Common Good --; 7. Nature and Knowledge --; 8. Logic and Knowledge --; 9. Immateriality --; 10. The "Predicamental" Perspective --; Three: The Concreteness of Pragmatism --; 11. Context --; 12. Science and Progress --; 13. Making Logic Practical --; 14. Nature and the Natural --; 15. "Context" as a Philosophical Concept --; Four: The Transcendentalism of Phenomenology --; 16. The Phenomenological Movement --; 17. An Approach to Social Context --; 18. Phenomenological Methodology --; 19. An Ontological Phenomenology? --; 20. Meta-Phenomenology --; Five: Conclusion --; Notes --; Index of Names --; Index of Subjects.
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Contemporary philosophy is by its nature pluralistic, to a perhaps greater extent than at any moment of the preceding tradition, in that there are multiple forms of thought competing for a position on the center of the philosophic stage. The reasons for this conceptual proliferation are numerous. But certainly one factor is the increasing development of contemporary means of publication and communication, which in turn make possible the rapid dissemination of ideas as well as an informed reaction to them. And this in turn has increased the possibility for serious philosophic exchange by enhancing the available opportunities for the interaction of competing forms of thought. But, although informed philosophic interaction has in principle become increasingly possible in recent years, the frequency, scope and quality of such discussion has often been less than satisfactory. Contemporary philosophic viewpoints tend not to interact in a Hegelian manner, as complementary aspects of a totally satisfactory and a-perspectival view, facets of a singly and all-embracing true position. Rather, contemporary philosophic viewpoints tend to portray themselves as mutually exclusive alternatives only occasionally willing to acknowledge the possible validity or even the intrinsic interest of other perspectives. Thus, although the multiplication of different forms of philosophy in principle means that there are greater possibilities for meaning ful exchange between them, in practice the tendency of each of the various philosophic positions to raise claims to philosophic truth from its point of view alone has had the effect of impeding such interaction.
PARALLEL TITLE PROPER
Parallel Title
Sovietica, vol. 45
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Dialectical materialism.
Philosophy (General)
Political science -- Philosophy.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CLASSIFICATION
Class number
B72
Book number
.
B986
1981
PERSONAL NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY
by Tom Rockmore, William J. Gavin, James G. Colbert, Thomas J. Blakeley.