An Interdisciplinary View : Salzburg Colloquium on Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities
First Statement of Responsibility
edited by Gerhard Zecha, Paul Weingartner.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Dordrecht
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Springer Netherlands
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
1987
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
(XV, 304 pages).
SERIES
Series Title
Theory and decision library., Series A,, Philosophy and methodology of the social sciences ;, 1.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
1 / Conscience: Foundational Aspects --; Conscience as Principled Responsibility: On the Philosophy of Stage Six --; Discussion --; The Phenomenon of Conscience: Subject-Orientation and Object-Orientation --; Discussion --; 2 / Conscience: Social and Educational Aspects --; Value-Neutrality, Conscience, and the Social Sciences --; Discussion --; Moral Competence and Education in Democratic Society --; Discussion --; The Idea of Conscience in High School Students. Development of Judgments of Responsibility in Democratic Just Community Programs --; Discussion --; 3 / Conscience: Special Topics --; Conscience in Conflict? --; Discussion --; Aquinas' Theory of Conscience from a Logical Point of View --; Discussion --; The Ambivalent Relationship of Law and Freedom of Conscience: Intensification and Relaxation of Conscience Through the Legal System --; Discussion --; Psychoanalysis and Ethics --; Discussion --; Index of Names --; Index of Subjects.
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Value change and uncertainty about the validity of traditional moral convictions are frequently observed when scientific re search confronts us with new moral problems or challenges the moral responsibility of the scientist. Which ethics is to be relied on? Which principles are the most reasonable, the most humane ones? For want of an appropriate answer, moral authorities of ten point to conscience, the individual conscience, which seems to be man's unique, directly accessible and final source of moral contention. But what is meant by 'conscience'? There is hardly a notion as widely used and at the same time as controversial as that of conscience. In the history of ethics we can distinguish several trends in the interpretation of the concept and function of conscience. The Greeks used the word O"uvEt81lm~ to denote a kind of 'accompa nying knowledge' that mostly referred to negatively experienced behavior. In Latin, the expression conscientia meant a knowing together pointing beyond the individual consciousness to the common knowledge of other people. In the Bible, especially in the New Testament, O"uvEt81l0"t~ is used for the guiding con sciousness of the morality of one's own action.
PARALLEL TITLE PROPER
Parallel Title
Interdisciplinary View; Theory and Decision Library, vol. 1; Conscience