Judgement and truth in early analytic philosophy and phenomenology
General Material Designation
[Book]
First Statement of Responsibility
edited by Mark Textor.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
New York
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Palgrave Macmillan
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2013
SERIES
Series Title
History of analytic philosophy.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Theodor Lipps and the Psycho-Logic Theory of Judgement; W. Martin --;Truth, Value, and Truth Value. Frege's Theory of Judgement and its Historical Background; G. Gabriel --;Merely Entertaining a Thought, Judging and Asserting. Notes on a Passage in Frege's 'The Thought'; W. Kunne --;We owe it to Sigwart! A New Look at the Content/Object Distinction in Early Phenomenological Theories of Judgment from Brentano to Twardowski; A. Betti --;Acceptance, Acknowledgment, Affirmation, Agreement, Assertion, Belief, Certainty, Conviction, Denial, Judgment, Refusal & Rejection; K. Mulligan --;G.F. Stout and Russell's Earliest Account of Judgement; M.van der Schaar --;The Myth of the Coherence Theory of Truth; N. Damnjanovic & S. Candlish --;The Origin and Influence of G.E. Moore's 'The Nature of Judgment'; C. Preti --;The Russell-Wittgenstein Dispute: A new Perspective; F. McBride --;Judgement and Truth in the Early Wittgenstein; H. Glock.
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
What is judgement? is a question that has exercised generations of philosophers. Early analytic philosophers (Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein) and phenomenologists (Brentano, Husserl and Reinach) changed how philosophers think about this question. This book explores and assesses their contributions and help us to retrace their steps.