The Standard Biphasic-Contrast Examination of the Stomach and Duodenum :
General Material Designation
[Book]
Other Title Information
Method, Results, and Radiological Atlas
First Statement of Responsibility
by J. Odo Op den Orth.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Dordrecht
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Springer Netherlands
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
1979
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
(190 pages)
SERIES
Series Title
Series in Radiology, Radiological Examination of the Gastrointestinal Tract, 1.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
I. Method --;1. A Brief Review of Radiological Techniques for Examination of the Stomach and Duodenum --;2. Why is a Standard Biphasic-Contrast Examination Necessary? --;3. The Standard Biphasic-Contrast Gastric Series --;4. Basic Principles for the Interpretation of Double-Contrast Studies --;II. Results --;5. General Remarks --;6. Quantitative Results in the Diagnosis of Malignant Lesions of the Stomach --;III. Radiological Atlas of Common Lesions of the Stomach and Duodenum --;7. Stomach --;8. Duodenum --;References.
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
The rapid growth of fibre-optic endoscopy in recent than 7,500 examinations has been accumulated. years has had two consequences for the radiology of In part I of this study the theoretical background the stomach and the duocienum. and the technique of examination proper are de scribed. The basic principles of interpretation of DC 1. Radiology has lost its previously rather auton studies are stated. omous position in this field. Part II deals with the results. Chapter 5 consists of 2. As a result of the constant feed-back from the general remarks on the results, and on the comple endoscopist, which the radiologist can and should mentary role of radiological examination and endos have, he is in an excellent position to re-evaluate copy. Chapter 6 deals with a quantative study of and improve his own technique of examination. standard biphasic-contrast examinations in patients The author believes that the radiological exam over a period of 3 years. This study was restricted to ination retains its value as a screening technique and malignant lesions, because it is only in this group a complementary method to gastroscopy and biop that the definite criterion, a histological diagnosis, is sy. Only a sophisticated radiological technique will obtained. The natural history of malignant lesions fulfil these requirements. In 1973 the author devel also makes follow-up studies possible. Results of the oped a standard examination that was called "bi diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer (EGC) are phasic", because it combines the advantages of included.