religious persecution and conflict in the twenty-first century /
First Statement of Responsibility
Brian J. Grim, Roger Finke
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
New York :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Cambridge University Press,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
c2011
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
xiii, 257 p. :
Other Physical Details
ill. ;
Dimensions
23 cm
SERIES
Series Title
Cambridge studies in social theory, religion, and politics
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 223-237) and index
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Religious persecution : pervasive and pernicious -- Religious freedom : broken promises -- Persecution : the price of freedoms denied -- Case studies : Japan (high levels of religious freedoms), Brazil (freedoms with some tensions), and Nigeria (partitioned religion-state power) -- A closer look : China (religion viewed as a threat), India (social monolopy), and Iran (social and political monopoly) -- What about Muslim-majority countries? -- Do religious freedoms really matter? -- Appendix. Testing the competing arguments
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
"The Price of Freedom Denied shows that, contrary to popular opinion, ensuring religious freedom for all reduces violent religious persecution and conflict. Others have suggested that restrictions on religion are necessary to maintain order or preserve a peaceful religious homogeneity. Brian J. Grim and Roger Finke show that restricting religious freedoms is associated with higher levels of violent persecution. Relying on a new source of coded data for nearly 200 countries and case studies of six countries, the book offers a global profile of religious freedom and religious persecution. Grim and Finke report that persecution is evident in all regions and is standard fare for many. They also find that religious freedoms are routinely denied and that government and the society at large serve to restrict these freedoms. They conclude that the price of freedom denied is high indeed"--