how literary critics and social theorists are murdering our past /
First Statement of Responsibility
Keith Windschuttle.
EDITION STATEMENT
Edition Statement
1st Free Prees ed.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
New York :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Free Press,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
1997.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
298 p. ;
Dimensions
24 cm.
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
Originally published: Paddington, NSW, Australia : Macleay Press, 1996. Rev. and expanded international ed.
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Paris labels and designer concepts: the ascension of cultural studies and the deluge of social theory -- The omnipotence of signs: semiotics and the conquest of America -- Bad language and theatrical gestures: structuralism and ethnohistory in the Pacific -- The deconstruction of imperial history: poststructuralism and the founding of Australia -- The discourses of Michel Foucault: poststructuralism and anti-humanism -- The fall of Communism and the end of history: from posthistory to postmodernism -- History as a social science: relativism, hermeneutics and induction -- History as literature: fiction, poetics, and criticism -- The return of tribalism: cultural relativism, structuralism and the death of Cook.
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
For 2,500 years, since the time of Herodotus and Thucydides, historians have sought to record the truth about the past. Today, however, the discipline is suffering a potentially lethal attach from the rise to prominence of an array of French-inspired literary and social theories, each of which denies that truth and knowledge about the past are possible. These theories claim the central point on which history was founded no longer holds: there is no fundamental distinction between history and myth or between history and fiction. Historians in classrooms from Berkeley to Paris have embraced these views, and an increasing number of literary critics and social theorists now feel free to define their own work as history and to call themselves historians. The result is revolutionary: historians have not only changed how history is taught, they are also increasingly obscuring the very facts on which the truth must be built. In The Killing of History, Keith Windschuttle offers both a devastating expose of the absurdity of these developments and a defense of the integrity of Western intellectual traditions which are now so widely attacked. Windschuttle examines exactly what is being taught about Columbus' discovery of the New World; the history of asylums and prisons in Europe; the fall of Communism in 1989; and the Battle of Quebec in 1759. He offers a much needed defense of traditional history as a properly scientific endeavor and argues that the great works of history should still be regarded as among the finest forms of Western literature.