• الرئیسیة
  • البحث المتقدم
  • قائمة المکتبات
  • حول الموقع
  • اتصل بنا
  • نشأة
  • ورود / ثبت نام

عنوان
What Is Gained and What Is Lost by the Faith-based Organization (FBO) Term?

پدید آورنده
Hans Morten Haugen

موضوع
Dutch Knowledge Centre Religion and Development,International Partnership on Religion and Sustainable Development,International Religious Health Assets Programme,RAD Research Programme,religion and development,sustainable development goals,traditional practices,World Bank

رده

کتابخانه
کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی

محل استقرار
استان: قم ـ شهر: قم

کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

LA121261

انگلیسی

What Is Gained and What Is Lost by the Faith-based Organization (FBO) Term?
[Article]
Hans Morten Haugen

Leiden
Brill

The growing interest in the role of faith-based organizations (FBOs) in promoting social development is welcome, but the article nevertheless questions the value of the broad term FBOs. The categorizations of FBOs do not bring adequate clarity. Four justifications for keeping the FBO term are analyzed: (i) highlighting the importance of religion and the size of FBOs; (ii) identifying characteristics of FBOs, specifically extensive networks and stronger local presence; (iii) surveillance of FBOs as potentially divisive actors; and (iv) necessary to map donations. Four justifications for scrapping the FBO term are also analyzed: (i) the term FBO might give connotations to religiously extremist movements - or to Western worldviews; (ii) the emphasis on the "devotedness" inherent in FBOs might directly and indirectly promote behavioral economics; (iii) both religion and FBOs might become "essentialized"; and (iv) research of FBOs is characterized by a lack of rigorous methodological, investigative approach. The growing interest in the role of faith-based organizations (FBOs) in promoting social development is welcome, but the article nevertheless questions the value of the broad term FBOs. The categorizations of FBOs do not bring adequate clarity. Four justifications for keeping the FBO term are analyzed: (i) highlighting the importance of religion and the size of FBOs; (ii) identifying characteristics of FBOs, specifically extensive networks and stronger local presence; (iii) surveillance of FBOs as potentially divisive actors; and (iv) necessary to map donations. Four justifications for scrapping the FBO term are also analyzed: (i) the term FBO might give connotations to religiously extremist movements - or to Western worldviews; (ii) the emphasis on the "devotedness" inherent in FBOs might directly and indirectly promote behavioral economics; (iii) both religion and FBOs might become "essentialized"; and (iv) research of FBOs is characterized by a lack of rigorous methodological, investigative approach.

2019
262-288
Mission Studies
36/2
1573-3831

Dutch Knowledge Centre Religion and Development
International Partnership on Religion and Sustainable Development
International Religious Health Assets Programme
RAD Research Programme
religion and development
sustainable development goals
traditional practices
World Bank

Hans Morten Haugen

10.1163/15733831-12341652

 مطالعه متن کتاب 

p

[Article]
275578

a
Y

الاقتراح / اعلان الخلل

تحذیر! دقق في تسجیل المعلومات
ارسال عودة
تتم إدارة هذا الموقع عبر مؤسسة دار الحديث العلمية - الثقافية ومركز البحوث الكمبيوترية للعلوم الإسلامية (نور)
المكتبات هي المسؤولة عن صحة المعلومات كما أن الحقوق المعنوية للمعلومات متعلقة بها
برترین جستجوگر - پنجمین جشنواره رسانه های دیجیتال