• الرئیسیة
  • البحث المتقدم
  • قائمة المکتبات
  • حول الموقع
  • اتصل بنا
  • نشأة
  • ورود / ثبت نام

عنوان
The Authority of Early Hebrew Scripture Texts

پدید آورنده
Emanuel Tov

موضوع
authoritative status,Scripture scrolls,textual plurality

رده

کتابخانه
کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی

محل استقرار
استان: قم ـ شهر: قم

کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

LA117121

انگلیسی

The Authority of Early Hebrew Scripture Texts
[Article]
Emanuel Tov

Leiden
Brill

Our investigation begins with an analysis of the abstract and tangible aspects of Scriptural authority after the first century ce, thus laying the foundation for a discussion of this topic in earlier times. It is much more difficult to define authority at that early stage than in later periods, because Scripture was still in the making. We avoid an analysis of canonization, focusing on ancient scrolls, but realize that scrolls were only copied after a book had obtained an authoritative status. Among the textual witnesses of Scripture, we assume textual plurality, which is particularly noticeable at Qumran, across the board, while the proto-rabbinic movement adhered only to the proto-MT texts, and the Samaritans only to their own Torah. We describe different kinds of Scripture scrolls, assuming that Scripture-like scrolls such as liturgical, excerpted and partial scrolls had no authoritative status, while all other scrolls did. These scrolls were authoritative throughout ancient Israel in spite of the differences between them, although it is unclear which source other than tradition granted that authority. We provide some tentative criteria for assuming an authoritative status. Our investigation begins with an analysis of the abstract and tangible aspects of Scriptural authority after the first century ce, thus laying the foundation for a discussion of this topic in earlier times. It is much more difficult to define authority at that early stage than in later periods, because Scripture was still in the making. We avoid an analysis of canonization, focusing on ancient scrolls, but realize that scrolls were only copied after a book had obtained an authoritative status. Among the textual witnesses of Scripture, we assume textual plurality, which is particularly noticeable at Qumran, across the board, while the proto-rabbinic movement adhered only to the proto-MT texts, and the Samaritans only to their own Torah. We describe different kinds of Scripture scrolls, assuming that Scripture-like scrolls such as liturgical, excerpted and partial scrolls had no authoritative status, while all other scrolls did. These scrolls were authoritative throughout ancient Israel in spite of the differences between them, although it is unclear which source other than tradition granted that authority. We provide some tentative criteria for assuming an authoritative status.

2011
276-295
Journal of Reformed Theology
5/3
1569-7312

authoritative status
Scripture scrolls
textual plurality

Emanuel Tov

10.1163/156973111X608516

 مطالعه متن کتاب 

p

[Article]
275578

a
Y

الاقتراح / اعلان الخلل

تحذیر! دقق في تسجیل المعلومات
ارسال عودة
تتم إدارة هذا الموقع عبر مؤسسة دار الحديث العلمية - الثقافية ومركز البحوث الكمبيوترية للعلوم الإسلامية (نور)
المكتبات هي المسؤولة عن صحة المعلومات كما أن الحقوق المعنوية للمعلومات متعلقة بها
برترین جستجوگر - پنجمین جشنواره رسانه های دیجیتال