Consent in the law: a preliminary examination -- A Gewirthian approach to consent in the law -- The principle of generic consistency: its justification and application -- The functions of consent in the law -- Consent in the law I: questions of adequacy -- Subjects of consent: questions of capacity and competence -- The conditions of (valid) consent I: unforced and informed choice -- The conditions of consent II: duress, undue influence, and disclosure -- Questions of signalling and scope, withdrawal, and refusal -- Consent in the law II: questions of necessity and sufficiency -- The necessity, sufficiency, and relevance of consent I: private wrong and private empowerment -- The necessity, sufficiency, and relevance of consent II: public wrong -- Consent as the basis of legal (political) authority and obligation -- Consent and the stability and authority of law -- Consent as procedural justification: concluding remarks.
0
In a community that takes rights seriously, consent features pervasively in both moral and legal discourse as a justifying reason: stated simply, where there is consent, there can be no complaint. However, without a clear appreciation of the nature of a consent-based justification, its integrity, both in principle and in practice, is liable to be compromised. This book examines the role of consent as a procedural justification, discussing the prerequisites for an adequate consent -- in particular, that an agent with the relevant capacity has made an unforced and informed choice, that the conse.