how ideas about race and gender shape public opinion /
Nicholas J.G. Winter.
Chicago :
University of Chicago Press,
2008.
1 online resource (xvi, 269 pages) :
illustrations
Studies in communication, media, and public opinion
Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-259) and index.
Race, gender, and political cognition -- Political rhetoric meets political psychology : the process of group implication -- American race and gender schemas -- Group implication in the laboratory -- Racialization of welfare and social security -- Gendering of health care reform -- Race and gender frames in American politics.
0
In addition to their obvious roles in American politics, race and gender also work in hidden ways to profoundly influence the way we think--and vote--about a vast array of issues that don't seem related to either category. As Nicholas Winter reveals in Dangerous Frames, politicians and leaders often frame these seemingly unrelated issues in ways that prime audiences to respond not to the policy at hand but instead to the way its presentation resonates with their deeply held beliefs about race and gender. Winter shows, for example, how official rhetoric about welfare and Social Security has tappe.
MIL
196684
Dangerous frames.
9780226902371
Political psychology, Case studies.
Public opinion-- United States.
Rhetoric-- Political aspects-- United States.
Sex role-- United States-- Public opinion.
Political psychology.
Public opinion.
Race relations-- Public opinion.
Rhetoric-- Political aspects.
Sex role-- Public opinion.
Social policy-- Psychological aspects.
SOCIAL SCIENCE-- Gender Studies.
United States, Politics and government, 1989-Psychological aspects.
United States, Race relations, Public opinion.
United States, Social policy, 1993-Psychological aspects.