Includes bibliographical references (pages 279-316) and index.
Declaiming the endtime -- Traveling hopefully -- The anxieties of ambiguity -- Unraveling gordian knots -- When too much is not enough -- The many births of Frank Lloyd Wright -- Destroying in order to save -- Speaking of history -- Sensing incongruity -- Poisoned chalices -- Scotching the myth-making machine -- Irreconcilable differences -- "We're changing everything ... again" -- Rule life vs. real life -- When might makes wrong -- Six hundred barrels of plaster of Paris -- Millions of moving parts -- He says, she says -- Bringing texts up to code -- Gaining and providing access -- Hearing a white horse coming.
0
Historians know about the past because they examine the evidence. But what exactly is "evidence," how do historians know what it means--and how can we trust them to get it right? Historian David Henige tackles such questions of historical reliability head-on in his skeptical, unsparing, and acerbically witty Historical Evidence and Argument. "Systematic doubt" is his watchword, and he practices what he preaches through a variety of insightful assessments of historical controversies--for example, over the dating of artifacts and the textual analysis of translated documents. Skepticism, Henige contends, forces us to recognize the limits of our knowledge, but is also a positive force that stimulates new scholarship to counter it.--Publisher description.
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.