Introduction: values and science: current controversies -- 1. Distinguishing between cognitive and social values -- 2. The borderlands between epistemic and non-epistemic values -- 3. Qualified epistemic priority: comparing two approaches to values in science -- 4. Values in science: against epistemic priority -- 5. Why inductive risk requires values in science -- 6. Why the argument from inductive risk doesn't justify incorporating non-epistemic values in scientific reasoning -- 7. Can social diversity be best incorporated into science by adopting the social value management ideal? -- 8. Feminism, values, and the bias paradox: why value management is not sufficient -- 9. Socializing medical research -- 10. Meanwhile, why not biomedical capitalism?
0
"Current Controversies in Values and Science asks ten philosophers to debate five questions (two philosophers per debate) that are driving contemporary work in this important area of philosophy of science. The book is perfect for the advanced student, building up her knowledge of the foundations of the field while also engaging its most cutting-edge questions. Introductions and annotated bibliographies for each debate, preliminary descriptions of each chapter, study questions, and a supplemental guide to further controversies involving values in science help provide clearer and richer snapshots of active controversies for all readers"--Provided by publisher.