انسان از دیدگاه ملاصدرا (1050ق ،1671م) و کرکگور (1813 ،1855م)
محمدکاظم رضازاده جودی
چکیده (انگلیسی): In this thesis, human matter and his entity dimentions from the view-point of Sadrolmotaallehin (1600-1671) and Kierkegaard (1813-1855) is examined. At first bases of anthroplogy of two thinker is mentioned and then results of its have been appraised . Sadra anthroplogy is based on four Views of scientic’ philosophical , mystical and religious transcendent theosophy exchange and combination of this four views ,originated new opinions in vavious discussions . Its obvioms sample is combination of this fourth bases in caus and effect , pantheism and perfect man matter , in these three subject Sadra view and its bases abut human is mentioned and completely from view of transcendent theosophy on human , is creative discussions . From Sadra View human recognition is like recognition of world exsisting phenomend and it is possible and essential and from different ways can be recived. From rational and intuitive knowledge we can be acquainte with human. From Sadra point it is not monodiention and from one angel , beside his recognition has various dimention, like : recognizing of material and physical dimention , human spirirual and rational dimention that makes three human exsisting. Spiritual dimention , after , rational dimention is the more important scope of human existence and itself has formed three scope of science and understanding , tendencies and actions. Sadra accepts human freedoms and free will and simultaneously emphesison priority and sovereignty of doom and fate and divine desting on world , human and his actions and finally Sadra believe that human obliged on his free will. Sadra attentions on society rights too , and he mentiond subjects like necessity of society and law , human freedoms and mentiond meaning of politic and piety. Beside human theoretic discussions , Sadra mentioned practical bases for onthroplogy that shows its importance to human recognition and ways of reaching perfection he said elements and obstacle of them . Despite Sadra powerful refleetions and inclinations for mysticism he resprcted wisdom and philosophy and defends its position and never accepts something opposite to wisdom even he rejects this point , in mystical affairs. He helps from wisdow and philosophy in strengthenig and explainig of religious bases like faith , and rejects every opposition and impossible matter severely and knows acceptance of principle of impossibility of contradiction , bases of whole human knowledges and thoughts